Shiv Martin Conflict Resolution and Mediation Training logo

Core service • Mediation and conciliation

Resolving the unresolvable.

When internal HR processes have stalled, and the cost of ongoing conflict is too high to ignore.

We provide independent, trauma-informed mediation and conciliation for high-stakes workplace disputes. The work does not stop at managing symptoms or containing bad behaviour. Shiv diagnoses the systemic root cause, creates a safe container for the truth to be spoken, and helps the parties move toward genuine, durable resolution.

Confidentiality assured

Independent and impartial facilitation

Trauma-informed and psychologically safe

Experienced in public sector and corporate matters

Shiv Martin in a professional boardroom environment supporting high-stakes workplace resolution.

What this service is designed for

  • Entrenched disputes where prior internal intervention has stalled
  • Matters requiring neutrality, discretion, and strong process design
  • Agreements that must hold after the mediation session ends

The reality of high-stakes conflict

The limits of internal intervention.

"By the time a matter reaches formal mediation, the argument is usually only the surface. Underneath it sits a system that has already been under strain for some time."

In complex organisations, especially within the public sector and large corporate environments, conflict rarely exists in a vacuum. By the time a dispute is serious enough to consider external mediation, the working relationship is often already deeply fractured. Trust has thinned or disappeared. Defensiveness is high. People are no longer simply debating a problem. They are protecting themselves from one another.

Internal HR teams and line managers are frequently placed in an impossible position. They are expected to resolve the issue while also carrying operational pressures, managing their own internal alliances, and working inside systems already implicated in the conflict. Even when the intent is sound, the perception of bias can be enough to undermine confidence in the process.

When a matter involves senior executives, allegations of bullying, post-investigation fallout, or entrenched departmental silos, an internal process is often not enough. The parties need an independent, neutral third party with enough authority to hold the process, enough care to create safety, and enough experience to recognise what is actually driving the dispute beneath the positions people have adopted.

This is where Shiv steps in. She provides the external authority and trauma-informed framework required to de-escalate the immediate crisis and begin the deeper work of rebuilding. The outcome sought is not a superficial ceasefire. It is a pathway back to workable trust, clearer boundaries, and an organisation less vulnerable to repeating the same fracture.

Methodology

Our approach: beyond the textbook.

Standard mediation often fails because it focuses only on the logical facts of the dispute while ignoring the emotional and systemic drivers underneath it. Shiv's methodology is different. It is shaped by two decades of experience in highly scrutinised, high-consequence environments where both psychological safety and structural rigour matter.

01

Phase 1: The diagnostic pre-brief

We never walk into a mediation blind. Before the parties ever sit in the same room, Shiv conducts rigorous, confidential pre-briefing sessions. This is where the architecture of the conflict is mapped carefully: emotional triggers, power dynamics, organisational pressures, prior interventions, and the unspoken needs driving surface behaviour. The aim is not to collect statements for a fight later. It is to understand what conditions will be required for the mediation itself to become productive rather than destructive.

02

Phase 2: Architecting the safe container

Resolution requires vulnerability, and vulnerability requires safety. During the joint session, Shiv's role is not simply to moderate turn-taking. It is to hold a psychologically safe environment strong enough for difficult truths to surface without the process collapsing into attack, shutdown, or humiliation. Boundaries are explicit. Trauma-informed facilitation techniques are used to steady nervous system escalation. The container itself becomes part of the intervention.

03

Phase 3: The shift from positions to needs

In high conflict, people become trapped in rigid positions: "I demand an apology," "I refuse to work with them," "They need to be held accountable." Those positions usually point to deeper human needs such as respect, safety, clarity, autonomy, or restored trust. Shiv guides the conversation beneath the argument so the parties can see what actually matters and begin building agreement around future needs rather than remaining trapped in past accusation.

04

Phase 4: Sustainable, binding agreements

A successful mediation does not end with a temporary feeling of relief. It ends with a clear, actionable framework for the future. Shiv helps the parties translate insight into behavioural commitments, practical communication rules, escalation pathways, and explicit boundaries. Success is defined in observable terms so the organisation is not left hoping the relationship will somehow repair itself after the session ends.

When to engage us

Recognising the tipping point.

Not every disagreement requires external mediation. Shiv is typically engaged when internal mechanisms have been exhausted, or when the risk profile of the matter is simply too high for an internal process to carry alone.

Executive and board level disputes

When conflict sits at the highest levels of leadership, the consequences ripple across the whole organisation. Shiv brings the discretion, gravitas, and neutrality required to mediate between founders, board members, and C-suite executives where power, visibility, and reputational risk are all elevated.

Formal grievances and bullying allegations

Once a complaint is formalised, the stakes rise quickly. The process must balance procedural fairness, psychological safety, organisational risk, and the human reality of the people involved. Shiv provides an independent conciliation process that protects both integrity and momentum.

Post-investigation rebuilding

After a workplace investigation, people often still need to work together. That is where many organisations discover the real work has only just begun. Shiv facilitates the rebuilding process so trust, role clarity, and workable norms can be re-established after a finding or formal process.

Proof

Proven outcomes in complex environments.

Due to the highly sensitive nature of this work, absolute confidentiality is maintained. The following anonymised scenarios reflect the kinds of engagements Shiv navigates and the outcomes the process is designed to support.

Scenario

The public sector department

The challenge

A state government department was dealing with a complete breakdown in communication between two senior directors. The dispute had created silos across their teams, strategic work had stalled, and multiple informal interventions had failed to change the pattern.

The intervention

Shiv designed a structured conciliation process that began with extensive confidential pre-briefing and individual coaching to lower defensive posturing. The joint work then focused on naming the systemic pressures underneath the conflict and establishing a new operating charter between the two directors.

The outcome

The directors agreed to a structured communication protocol, clarified escalation rules, and dissolved the silo pattern sufficiently for delayed projects to resume. The matter was stabilised without the need for formal disciplinary action or a deeper rupture in leadership trust.

Scenario

The national not-for-profit

The challenge

A newly appointed manager was facing allegations of upward bullying from members of their team. Absenteeism was rising, trust had collapsed, and the team environment had become highly charged and unsafe.

The intervention

Shiv used a hybrid approach: individual mediation with key parties to stabilise the core relational fractures, followed by a broader team facilitation process designed to reset cultural expectations, working norms, and accountability around behaviour.

The outcome

The immediate conflict was resolved, the team co-created a more viable behavioural framework, and psychological safety improved materially. The process gave the organisation a pathway forward that addressed both the acute matter and the culture surrounding it.

Final step

Stop managing the symptoms.

If you are dealing with an entrenched workplace dispute, delaying intervention will only increase the cost, financially, culturally, and relationally. Reach out today to discuss how Shiv can help architect a safe and workable resolution.

All initial enquiries are strictly confidential and obligation-free.

Start the conversation

Shiv reviews confidential enquiries personally and will guide the appropriate next step for the matter you are facing.